↓ Skip to main content

Comparative multi-omics systems analysis of Escherichia coli strains B and K-12

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Citations

dimensions_citation
138 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
356 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative multi-omics systems analysis of Escherichia coli strains B and K-12
Published in
Genome Biology, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/gb-2012-13-5-r37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sung Ho Yoon, Mee-Jung Han, Haeyoung Jeong, Choong Hoon Lee, Xiao-Xia Xia, Dae-Hee Lee, Ji Hoon Shim, Sang Yup Lee, Tae Kwang Oh, Jihyun F Kim

Abstract

Elucidation of a genotype-phenotype relationship is critical to understand an organism at the whole-system level. Here, we demonstrate that comparative analyses of multi-omics data combined with a computational modeling approach provide a framework for elucidating the phenotypic characteristics of organisms whose genomes are sequenced.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 356 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Denmark 3 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 2 <1%
Lithuania 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 336 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 91 26%
Researcher 75 21%
Student > Master 36 10%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 63 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 125 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 90 25%
Engineering 24 7%
Chemical Engineering 8 2%
Chemistry 7 2%
Other 35 10%
Unknown 67 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 June 2018.
All research outputs
#6,929,769
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#3,196
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,688
of 178,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.