You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Determining the optimal time for liberation from renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis (DOnE RRT)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2751-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Riley Jeremy Katulka, Abdalrhman Al Saadon, Meghan Sebastianski, Robin Featherstone, Ben Vandermeer, Samuel A. Silver, R. T. Noel Gibney, Sean M. Bagshaw, Oleksa G. Rewa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 78 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 11 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 6% |
| Spain | 5 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 5% |
| Mexico | 4 | 5% |
| Italy | 2 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 3% |
| Colombia | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 16 | 21% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 57 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 11 | 14% |
| Scientists | 9 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 49% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2021.
All research outputs
#883,823
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#667
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,304
of 476,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#26
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 476,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.