You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Limits of the social-benefit motive among high-risk patients: a field experiment on influenza vaccination behaviour
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-020-8246-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ozan Isler, Burcu Isler, Orestis Kopsacheilis, Eamonn Ferguson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 33% |
| Turkey | 2 | 22% |
| Germany | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 15% |
| Unknown | 41 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 April 2020.
All research outputs
#5,187,268
of 25,579,912 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,134
of 17,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,915
of 382,771 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#119
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,579,912 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,705 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,771 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.