You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intrapulmonary concentrations of meropenem administered by continuous infusion in critically ill patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized pharmacokinetic trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2763-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adela Benítez-Cano, Sonia Luque, Luisa Sorlí, Jesús Carazo, Isabel Ramos, Nuria Campillo, Víctor Curull, Albert Sánchez-Font, Carles Vilaplana, Juan P. Horcajada, Ramón Adalia, Silvia Bermejo, Enric Samsó, William Hope, Santiago Grau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 11% |
| Germany | 2 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 7% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 4% |
| Denmark | 1 | 4% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 14 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 21% |
| Scientists | 2 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 13% |
| Researcher | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 10% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 2% |
| Engineering | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 45 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,236,192
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,958
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,570
of 382,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#50
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.