You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
What is preventable harm in healthcare? A systematic review of definitions
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, May 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-128 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mohammed Nabhan, Tarig Elraiyah, Daniel R Brown, James Dilling, Annie LeBlanc, Victor M Montori, Timothy Morgenthaler, James Naessens, Larry Prokop, Veronique Roger, Stephen Swensen, Rodney L Thompson, M Hassan Murad |
Abstract |
Mitigating or reducing the risk of harm associated with the delivery of healthcare is a policy priority. While the risk of harm can be reduced in some instances (i.e. preventable), what constitutes preventable harm remains unclear. A standardized and clear definition of preventable harm is the first step towards safer and more efficient healthcare delivery system. We aimed to summarize the definitions of preventable harm and its conceptualization in healthcare. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 13 | 37% |
United States | 7 | 20% |
Spain | 2 | 6% |
Chile | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 66% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 26% |
Scientists | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Finland | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 129 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 25 | 19% |
Researcher | 23 | 17% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 10% |
Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 7% |
Other | 8 | 6% |
Other | 32 | 24% |
Unknown | 24 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 50 | 37% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 12% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 8 | 6% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 May 2021.
All research outputs
#1,770,337
of 25,402,889 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#603
of 8,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,209
of 178,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#6
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,402,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.