↓ Skip to main content

Androgens as therapy for androgen receptor-positive castration-resistant prostate cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
70 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Androgens as therapy for androgen receptor-positive castration-resistant prostate cancer
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, August 2011
DOI 10.1186/1423-0127-18-63
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chih-Pin Chuu, John M Kokontis, Richard A Hiipakka, Junichi Fukuchi, Hui-Ping Lin, Ching-Yu Lin, Chiech Huo, Liang-Cheng Su

Abstract

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed non-cutaneous tumor of men in Western countries. While surgery is often successful for organ-confined prostate cancer, androgen ablation therapy is the primary treatment for metastatic prostate cancer. However, this therapy is associated with several undesired side-effects, including increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Shortening the period of androgen ablation therapy may benefit prostate cancer patients. Intermittent Androgen Deprivation therapy improves quality of life, reduces toxicity and medical costs, and delays disease progression in some patients. Cell culture and xenograft studies using androgen receptor (AR)-positive castration-resistant human prostate cancers cells (LNCaP, ARCaP, and PC-3 cells over-expressing AR) suggest that androgens may suppress the growth of AR-rich prostate cancer cells. Androgens cause growth inhibition and G1 cell cycle arrest in these cells by regulating c-Myc, Skp2, and p27Kip via AR. Higher dosages of testosterone cause greater growth inhibition of relapsed tumors. Manipulating androgen/AR signaling may therefore be a potential therapy for AR-positive advanced prostate cancer.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
China 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 70 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Postgraduate 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Chemistry 3 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 15 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 July 2013.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#871
of 1,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,539
of 134,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.