↓ Skip to main content

H3K4me3 inversely correlates with DNA methylation at a large class of non-CpG-island containing start sites

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
H3K4me3 inversely correlates with DNA methylation at a large class of non-CpG-island containing start sites
Published in
Genome Medicine, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/gm346
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dheepa Balasubramanian, Batool Akhtar-Zaidi, Lingyun Song, Cynthia F Bartels, Martina Veigl, Lydia Beard, Lois Myeroff, Kishore Guda, James Lutterbaugh, Joseph Willis, Gregory E Crawford, Sanford D Markowitz, Peter C Scacheri, Balasubramanian D, Akhtar-Zaidi B, Song L, Bartels CF, Veigl M, Beard L, Myeroff L, Guda K, Lutterbaugh J, Willis J, Crawford GE, Markowitz SD, Scacheri PC

Abstract

In addition to mutations, epigenetic silencing of genes has been recognized as a fundamental mechanism that promotes human carcinogenesis. To date, characterization of epigenetic gene silencing has largely focused on genes in which silencing is mediated by hypermethylation of promoter-associated CpG islands, associated with loss of the H3K4me3 chromatin mark. Far less is known about promoters lacking CpG-islands or genes that are repressed by alternative mechanisms.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 66 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 27%
Researcher 17 24%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 10%
Student > Master 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 2 3%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Mathematics 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 2 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2012.
All research outputs
#2,669,068
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#616
of 1,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,203
of 164,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,432 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.