↓ Skip to main content

Hepatoprotective effects of Spirulina maxima in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a case series

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
34 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hepatoprotective effects of Spirulina maxima in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a case series
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, April 2010
DOI 10.1186/1752-1947-4-103
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aldo Ferreira-Hermosillo, Patricia V Torres-Duran, Marco A Juarez-Oropeza

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver diseases range from simple steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. The "two hits" hypothesis is widely accepted for its pathogenesis: the first hit is an increased fat flux to the liver, which predisposes our patient to a second hit where increasing free fatty acid oxidation into the mitochondria leads to oxidative stress, lipoperoxidation and a chain reaction with increased ROS. Clinical indications include abdominal cramps, meteorism and fatigue. Most patients, however, are asymptomatic, and diagnosis is based on aminotransferase elevation and ultrasonography (or "brilliant liver"). Spirulina maxima has been experimentally proven to possess in vivo and in vitro hepatoprotective properties by maintaining the liver lipid profile. This case report evaluates the hepatoprotective effects of orally supplied Spirulina maxima.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
India 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 16%
Student > Bachelor 13 15%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 9%
Other 20 22%
Unknown 13 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,745,314
of 25,107,281 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#201
of 4,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,229
of 100,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,107,281 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,472 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.