You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
Pro/con debate: Continuous versus intermittent dialysis for acute kidney injury: a never-ending story yet approaching the finish?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Critical Care, January 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/cc9345 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Raymond Vanholder, Wim Van Biesen, Eric Hoste, Norbert Lameire |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 5 | 5% |
Canada | 2 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Belgium | 1 | <1% |
Brazil | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 96 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 20 | 19% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 13% |
Researcher | 12 | 11% |
Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 9% |
Other | 27 | 25% |
Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 69% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
Psychology | 2 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 6 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 17% |