You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identification and clinical impact of potentially actionable somatic oncogenic mutations in solid tumor samples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-020-02273-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sinead Toomey, Aoife Carr, Mateusz Janusz Mezynski, Yasir Elamin, Shereen Rafee, Mattia Cremona, Clare Morgan, Stephen Madden, Khairun I. Abdul-Jalil, Kathy Gately, Angela Farrelly, Elaine W. Kay, Susan Kennedy, Kenneth O’Byrne, Liam Grogan, Oscar Breathnach, Patrick G. Morris, Alexander J. Eustace, Joanna Fay, Robert Cummins, Anthony O’Grady, Roshni Kalachand, Norma O’Donovan, Fergal Kelleher, Aine O’Reilly, Mark Doherty, John Crown, Bryan T. Hennessy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 6 | 46% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Italy | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 4 | 31% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 14 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 14% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2021.
All research outputs
#4,128,704
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#668
of 4,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,206
of 362,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#18
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.