↓ Skip to main content

The cost of child health inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preliminary scoping study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The cost of child health inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preliminary scoping study
Published in
BMC Public Health, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-384
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clair Mills, Papaarangi Reid, Rhema Vaithianathan

Abstract

Health inequalities have been extensively documented, internationally and in New Zealand. The cost of reducing health inequities is often perceived as high; however, recent international studies suggest the cost of "doing nothing" is itself significant. This study aimed to develop a preliminary estimate of the economic cost of health inequities between Māori (indigenous) and non-Māori children in New Zealand.

Twitter Demographics

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
New Zealand 2 2%
South Africa 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 111 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 16%
Researcher 16 14%
Student > Master 16 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 12%
Student > Postgraduate 10 9%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 24 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 14%
Social Sciences 16 14%
Arts and Humanities 6 5%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 25 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,729,689
of 24,403,034 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,928
of 16,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,348
of 168,356 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 218 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,403,034 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,119 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,356 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 218 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.