↓ Skip to main content

The adaptation and evaluation of a CBT-based manual for the inpatient treatment of youth depression: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The adaptation and evaluation of a CBT-based manual for the inpatient treatment of youth depression: a pilot study
Published in
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40814-020-00573-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Frey, Kathrin Pietsch, Laura Weninger, Matthias Brockhaus, Fabian Loy, Nathalie Claus, Petra Wagenbüchler, Selina Kornbichler, Jana Kroboth, Beatrice Georgii, Inga Wermuth, Anna Kititsina, Katharina Heiser, Gerd Schulte-Körne, Belinda Platt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 16%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Master 6 11%
Professor 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 23 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 20 36%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Neuroscience 2 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 27 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2020.
All research outputs
#20,183,973
of 24,811,707 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#942
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#276,041
of 366,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#30
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,811,707 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.