You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Improving the validity, relevance and feasibility of the continuum of care framework for maternal health in South Africa: a thematic analysis of experts’ perspectives
|
---|---|
Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, February 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12961-020-0537-8 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Mamothena Carol Mothupi, Lucia Knight, Hanani Tabana |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
South Africa | 2 | 29% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Australia | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 70 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 10 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
Other | 10 | 14% |
Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 26% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
Computer Science | 4 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Other | 7 | 10% |
Unknown | 25 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,774,412
of 24,150,351 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#806
of 1,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,266
of 364,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#19
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,150,351 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.