↓ Skip to main content

Identification of chemosensory receptor genes in Manduca sexta and knockdown by RNA interference

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of chemosensory receptor genes in Manduca sexta and knockdown by RNA interference
Published in
BMC Genomics, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-13-211
Pubmed ID
Authors

Natalie Howlett, Katherine L Dauber, Aditi Shukla, Brian Morton, John I Glendinning, Elyssa Brent, Caroline Gleason, Fahmida Islam, Denisse Izquierdo, Sweta Sanghavi, Anika Afroz, Aanam Aslam, Marissa Barbaro, Rebekah Blutstein, Margarita Borovka, Brianna Desire, Ayala Elikhis, Qing Fan, Katherine Hoffman, Amy Huang, Dominique Keefe, Sarah Lopatin, Samara Miller, Priyata Patel, Danielle Rizzini, Alyssa Robinson, Karimah Rokins, Aneta Turlik, Jennifer H Mansfield

Abstract

Insects detect environmental chemicals via a large and rapidly evolving family of chemosensory receptor proteins. Although our understanding of the molecular genetic basis for Drosophila chemoreception has increased enormously in the last decade, similar understanding in other insects remains limited. The tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta, has long been an important model for insect chemosensation, particularly from ecological, behavioral, and physiological standpoints. It is also a major agricultural pest on solanaceous crops. However, little sequence information and lack of genetic tools has prevented molecular genetic analysis in this species. The ability to connect molecular genetic mechanisms, including potential lineage-specific changes in chemosensory genes, to ecologically relevant behaviors and specializations in M. sexta would be greatly beneficial.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
China 2 3%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 18%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Researcher 10 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 53%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 14%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 12 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2012.
All research outputs
#20,157,329
of 22,665,794 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,243
of 10,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,143
of 165,091 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#82
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,665,794 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,615 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,091 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.