You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of protocolized diuresis for de-resuscitation in the intensive care unit
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2795-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brittany D. Bissell, Melanie E. Laine, Melissa L. Thompson Bastin, Alexander H. Flannery, Andrew Kelly, Jeremy Riser, Javier A. Neyra, Jordan Potter, Peter E. Morris |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 35 | 28% |
| Mexico | 12 | 10% |
| Japan | 4 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 3 | 2% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Singapore | 2 | 2% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 53 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 96 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 11% |
| Scientists | 11 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 9% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 19 | 21% |
| Unknown | 29 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 38% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 9 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 March 2022.
All research outputs
#559,604
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#375
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,666
of 382,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#15
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.