You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducible and transparent research practices in published neurology research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Integrity and Peer Review, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41073-020-0091-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shelby Rauh, Trevor Torgerson, Austin L. Johnson, Jonathan Pollard, Daniel Tritz, Matt Vassar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 19% |
| United States | 4 | 19% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 5% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 7 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,047,671
of 25,211,948 outputs
Outputs from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#86
of 131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,704
of 365,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Integrity and Peer Review
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,211,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 74.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,815 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.