You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An affordable, quality-assured community-based system for high-resolution entomological surveillance of vector mosquitoes that reflects human malaria infection risk patterns
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-11-172 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prosper P Chaki, Yeromin Mlacha, Daniel Msellemu, Athuman Muhili, Alpha D Malishee, Zacharia J Mtema, Samson S Kiware, Ying Zhou, Neil F Lobo, Tanya L Russell, Stefan Dongus, Nicodem J Govella, Gerry F Killeen |
| Abstract |
More sensitive and scalable entomological surveillance tools are required to monitor low levels of transmission that are increasingly common across the tropics, particularly where vector control has been successful. A large-scale larviciding programme in urban Dar es Salaam, Tanzania is supported by a community-based (CB) system for trapping adult mosquito densities to monitor programme performance. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Senegal | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 129 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 32 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 19 | 14% |
| Unknown | 38 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2012.
All research outputs
#15,245,883
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#4,454
of 5,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,382
of 164,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#51
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 164,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.