↓ Skip to main content

Motives for khat use and abstinence in Yemen - a gender perspective

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Motives for khat use and abstinence in Yemen - a gender perspective
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-10-735
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Wedegaertner, Hussein al-Warith, Thomas Hillemacher, Bert te Wildt, Udo Schneider, Stefan Bleich, Dirk Breitmeier

Abstract

Khat consumption is widespread in Yemeni society and causes problems both in economic development and public health. Preventive measures have been largely unsuccessful and the cultivation continues to proliferate. The gender-specific motives for khat use and abstinence were studied to create a toe-hold for more specific interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ethiopia 1 2%
Sweden 1 2%
Kenya 1 2%
Unknown 53 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Researcher 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 16 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 16%
Social Sciences 5 9%
Psychology 5 9%
Arts and Humanities 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 21 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,294,955
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,646
of 16,815 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,661
of 193,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#15
of 135 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,815 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 135 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.