You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating the feasibility and acceptability of the Namaste Care program in long-term care settings in Canada
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pilot and Feasibility Studies, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40814-020-00575-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Kaasalainen, Paulette V. Hunter, Vanina Dal Bello-Haas, Lisa Dolovich, Katherine Froggatt, Thomas Hadjistavropoulos, Maureen Markle-Reid, Jenny Ploeg, Joyce Simard, Lehana Thabane, Jenny T. van der Steen, Ladislav Volicer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 17% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2020.
All research outputs
#13,034,094
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#532
of 1,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,387
of 360,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pilot and Feasibility Studies
#21
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,053 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.