↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and cultural appropriateness of psychosocial interventions for paediatric burn patients and caregivers: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and cultural appropriateness of psychosocial interventions for paediatric burn patients and caregivers: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12889-020-8366-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

H. M. Williams, K. Hunter, K. Clapham, C. Ryder, R. Kimble, B. Griffin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 13%
Researcher 12 9%
Student > Master 11 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 58 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 11%
Unspecified 4 3%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 21 15%
Unknown 58 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2020.
All research outputs
#4,213,709
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,922
of 17,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,688
of 387,452 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#89
of 344 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,855 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,452 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 344 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.