↓ Skip to main content

Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Performance management methods and practices among nurses in primary health care settings: a systematic scoping review protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13643-020-01294-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cynthia Zandile Madlabana, Tivani Phosa Mashamba-Thompson, Inge Petersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 16%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Other 9 6%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 66 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 32 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 15 9%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 14 9%
Unknown 70 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,858,638
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#996
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,567
of 361,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#28
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.