↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients—a randomized clinical trial

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
115 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy, immunogenicity, and safety of IC43 recombinant Pseudomonas aeruginosa vaccine in mechanically ventilated intensive care patients—a randomized clinical trial
Published in
Critical Care, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13054-020-2792-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christopher Adlbrecht, Raphael Wurm, Pieter Depuydt, Herbert Spapen, Jose A. Lorente, Thomas Staudinger, Jacques Creteur, Christian Zauner, Andreas Meier-Hellmann, Philipp Eller, Margot Vander Laenen, Zsolt Molnár, István Várkonyi, Bernhard Schaaf, Mária Héjja, Vladimír Šrámek, Hauke Schneider, Niranjan Kanesa-thasan, Susanne Eder-Lingelbach, Anton Klingler, Katrin Dubischar, Nina Wressnigg, Jordi Rello

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 115 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 11%
Researcher 12 10%
Student > Master 12 10%
Other 9 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 48 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 4%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 17 15%
Unknown 50 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2020.
All research outputs
#5,450,774
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,511
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,789
of 385,826 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#81
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,826 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.