↓ Skip to main content

Assessing physical activity in people with mental illness: 23-country reliability and validity of the simple physical activity questionnaire (SIMPAQ)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
75 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing physical activity in people with mental illness: 23-country reliability and validity of the simple physical activity questionnaire (SIMPAQ)
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s12888-020-2473-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Rosenbaum, R. Morell, A. Abdel-Baki, M. Ahmadpanah, T. V. Anilkumar, L. Baie, A. Bauman, S. Bender, J. Boyan Han, S. Brand, S. Bratland-Sanda, J. Bueno-Antequera, A. Camaz Deslandes, L. Carneiro, A. Carraro, C. P. Castañeda, F. Castro Monteiro, J. Chapman, J. Y. Chau, L. J. Chen, B. Chvatalova, L. Chwastiak, G. Corretti, M. Dillon, C. Douglas, S. T. Egger, F. Gaughran, M. Gerber, E. Gobbi, K. Gould, M. Hatzinger, E. Holsboer-Trachsler, Z. Hoodbhoy, C. Imboden, P. S. Indu, R. Iqbal, F. R. Jesus-Moraleida, S. Kondo, P. W. Ku, O. Lederman, E. H. M. Lee, B. Malchow, E. Matthews, P. Mazur, A. Meneghelli, A. Mian, B. Morseth, D. Munguia-Izquierdo, L. Nyboe, B. O’Donoghue, A. Perram, J. Richards, A. J. Romain, M. Romaniuk, D. Sadeghi Bahmani, M. Sarno, F. Schuch, N. Schweinfurth, B. Stubbs, R. Uwakwe, T. Van Damme, E. Van Der Stouwe, D. Vancampfort, S. Vetter, A. Waterreus, P. B. Ward

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 75 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 274 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 12%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Researcher 27 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 6%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 90 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 35 13%
Psychology 33 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 24 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 22 8%
Social Sciences 13 5%
Other 38 14%
Unknown 109 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 51. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#761,225
of 24,037,774 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#202
of 5,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,453
of 365,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#7
of 127 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,037,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 127 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.