You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Estimating relative biomasses of organisms in microbiota using “phylopeptidomics”
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Microbiome, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40168-020-00797-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olivier Pible, François Allain, Virginie Jouffret, Karen Culotta, Guylaine Miotello, Jean Armengaud |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 23% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
| Scientists | 6 | 46% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 9 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 27% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 16% |
| Unknown | 11 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2020.
All research outputs
#2,150,904
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#856
of 1,472 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,871
of 362,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#35
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,472 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.3. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,402 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.