You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The insulinogenic effect of whey protein is partially mediated by a direct effect of amino acids and GIP on β-cells
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition & Metabolism, May 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-7075-9-48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Albert Salehi, Ulrika Gunnerud, Sarheed J Muhammed, Elin Östman, Jens J Holst, Inger Björck, Patrik Rorsman |
| Abstract |
Whey protein increases postprandial serum insulin levels. This has been associated with increased serum levels of leucine, isoleucine, valine, lysine, threonine and the incretin hormone glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP). We have examined the effects of these putative mediators of whey's action on insulin secretion from isolated mouse Langerhans islets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 88 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 15 | 17% |
| United States | 7 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 5% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 3% |
| India | 3 | 3% |
| Saudi Arabia | 2 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 6% |
| Unknown | 41 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 71 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 11% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
| Researcher | 17 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 19% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 8% |
| Sports and Recreations | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 11% |
| Unknown | 37 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#351,288
of 25,649,244 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition & Metabolism
#59
of 1,022 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,585
of 179,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition & Metabolism
#3
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,649,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,022 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.