Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2021

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 18 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation: 44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley: 44 Mendeley

Summary X Dimensions citations

So far, Altmetric has seen 19 X posts from 18 X users, with an upper bound of 61,931 followers.

RT @GSCollins: "Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multiva…

02 May 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @triadsou: Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivari…

12 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

RT @GSCollins: "Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multiva…

12 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

Re-evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of bootstrap-based optimism correction methods in the development of multivariable clinical prediction models. Katsuhiro Iba, Tomohiro Shinozaki, Kazushi Maruo & Hisashi Noma. BMC Med Res Methodol. https:/

12 Jan 2021

Reply Repost Favourite

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output.

Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 15 additional X posts.