You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Children’s and adolescents’ experiences of healthcare professionals: scoping review protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-020-01298-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gail Davison, Martina Ann Kelly, Andrew Thompson, Tim Dornan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 58% |
| Ireland | 2 | 17% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Scientists | 5 | 42% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 15 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 20 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#3,973,880
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#768
of 2,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,438
of 362,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#21
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,015 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.