You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating and optimizing the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR) for use in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-020-0977-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arianna Rubin Means, Christopher G. Kemp, Marie-Claire Gwayi-Chore, Sarah Gimbel, Caroline Soi, Kenneth Sherr, Bradley H. Wagenaar, Judith N. Wasserheit, Bryan J. Weiner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 28% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Guinea | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 49% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 18 | 46% |
| Members of the public | 15 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 337 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 337 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 44 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 43 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 4% |
| Other | 51 | 15% |
| Unknown | 111 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 38 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 11% |
| Psychology | 20 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 46 | 14% |
| Unknown | 136 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,383,364
of 24,155,398 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#251
of 1,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,453
of 368,041 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,155,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,041 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.