↓ Skip to main content

Influence of different preoperative fasting times on women and neonates in cesarean section: a retrospective analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Influence of different preoperative fasting times on women and neonates in cesarean section: a retrospective analysis
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, March 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12884-019-2254-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Li, Danchen Su, Yijuan Sun, Zurong Hu, Zaomei Wei, Jie Jia

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 3 6%
Student > Postgraduate 3 6%
Lecturer 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 19 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 24%
Unspecified 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unknown 19 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#20,609,577
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,866
of 4,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#302,014
of 351,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#77
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,232 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.