You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Standardized image interpretation and post-processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance - 2020 update Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR): Board of Trustees Task Force on Standardized Post-Processing
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12968-020-00610-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeanette Schulz-Menger, David A. Bluemke, Jens Bremerich, Scott D. Flamm, Mark A. Fogel, Matthias G. Friedrich, Raymond J. Kim, Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Christopher M. Kramer, Dudley J. Pennell, Sven Plein, Eike Nagel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 14% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 7% |
| Egypt | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Turkey | 1 | 7% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 7% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 266 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 35 | 13% |
| Other | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 39 | 15% |
| Unknown | 90 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 119 | 45% |
| Engineering | 15 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 5% |
| Unknown | 103 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,281,865
of 25,818,700 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#254
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,615
of 391,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,818,700 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 391,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.