You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
When species matches are unavailable are DNA barcodes correctly assigned to higher taxa? An assessment using sphingid moths
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-11-18 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John James Wilson, Rodolphe Rougerie, Justin Schonfeld, Daniel H Janzen, Winnie Hallwachs, Mehrdad Hajibabaei, Ian J Kitching, Jean Haxaire, Paul DN Hebert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 29 | 17% |
| Unknown | 14 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 117 | 68% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Environmental Science | 14 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 5 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,759,452
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,076
of 3,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,043
of 133,493 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,493 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.