↓ Skip to main content

The impact of additive or substitutive clinical study design on the negotiated reimbursement for oncology pharmaceuticals after early benefit assessment in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Health Economics Review, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The impact of additive or substitutive clinical study design on the negotiated reimbursement for oncology pharmaceuticals after early benefit assessment in Germany
Published in
Health Economics Review, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s13561-020-00263-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. M. Dintsios, I. Beinhauer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 14 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 14%
Researcher 2 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 14%
Student > Bachelor 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 2 14%
Social Sciences 2 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 14%
Chemical Engineering 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 2 14%
Unknown 4 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2020.
All research outputs
#20,609,577
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from Health Economics Review
#421
of 442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,056
of 365,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Economics Review
#7
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.