You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12909-020-1987-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Kiesewetter, Michael Sailer, Valentina M. Jung, Regina Schönberger, Elisabeth Bauer, Jan M. Zottmann, Inga Hege, Hanna Zimmermann, Frank Fischer, Martin R. Fischer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 102 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Unknown | 46 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Unknown | 50 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2020.
All research outputs
#13,986,235
of 23,198,445 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,874
of 3,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#188,589
of 365,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#37
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,198,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.