↓ Skip to main content

S1 guidelines “lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis” (abridged and translated version)

Overview of attention for article published in Neurological Research and Practice, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 168)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
S1 guidelines “lumbar puncture and cerebrospinal fluid analysis” (abridged and translated version)
Published in
Neurological Research and Practice, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42466-020-0051-z
Authors

H. Tumani, H. F. Petereit, A. Gerritzen, C. C. Gross, A. Huss, S. Isenmann, S. Jesse, M. Khalil, P. Lewczuk, J. Lewerenz, F. Leypoldt, N. Melzer, S. G. Meuth, M. Otto, K. Ruprecht, E. Sindern, A. Spreer, M. Stangel, H. Strik, M. Uhr, J. Vogelgsang, K.-P. Wandinger, T. Weber, M. Wick, B. Wildemann, J. Wiltfang, D. Woitalla, I. Zerr, T. Zimmermann

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 15%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 7 15%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 37%
Neuroscience 5 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 17 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#2,405,425
of 21,730,136 outputs
Outputs from Neurological Research and Practice
#22
of 168 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,412
of 290,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neurological Research and Practice
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,730,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 168 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them