↓ Skip to main content

Cloacal swabs and alcohol bird specimens are good proxies for compositional analyses of gut microbial communities of Great tits (Parus major)

Overview of attention for article published in Animal Microbiome, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cloacal swabs and alcohol bird specimens are good proxies for compositional analyses of gut microbial communities of Great tits (Parus major)
Published in
Animal Microbiome, March 2020
DOI 10.1186/s42523-020-00026-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kasun H. Bodawatta, Katerina Puzejova, Katerina Sam, Michael Poulsen, Knud A. Jønsson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 7%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 7%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 60%
Environmental Science 1 7%
Unknown 5 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2021.
All research outputs
#14,176,461
of 18,422,743 outputs
Outputs from Animal Microbiome
#101
of 108 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#226,106
of 325,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Microbiome
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,422,743 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 108 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them