You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Implementation process and outcomes of a mental health programme integrated in primary care clinics in rural Mexico: a mixed-methods study
|
---|---|
Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, March 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13033-020-00346-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Georgina Miguel-Esponda, Nathaniel Bohm-Levine, Fátima Gabriela Rodríguez-Cuevas, Alex Cohen, Ritsuko Kakuma |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 27% |
United States | 2 | 18% |
Nigeria | 1 | 9% |
Sri Lanka | 1 | 9% |
Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
Scientists | 3 | 27% |
Unknown | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 98 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 14 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 13% |
Researcher | 8 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
Other | 23 | 23% |
Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
Psychology | 8 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
Other | 18 | 18% |
Unknown | 33 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2021.
All research outputs
#4,295,496
of 23,511,526 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#293
of 725 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,310
of 367,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#11
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,511,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 725 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.