↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) for the identification of Mycoplasma species

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) for the identification of Mycoplasma species
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2005
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-5-46
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Stakenborg, Jo Vicca, Patrick Butaye, Dominiek Maes, Thierry De Baere, Rita Verhelst, Johan Peeters, Aart de Kruif, Freddy Haesebrouck, Mario Vaneechoutte

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Belgium 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 55 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 23%
Student > Master 9 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 7%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 10 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 32 52%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 8%
Engineering 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 2%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 11 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,482,726
of 22,873,031 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,550
of 7,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,289
of 57,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,873,031 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.