You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Policy guidance on threats to legislative interventions in public health: a realist synthesis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, April 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-11-222 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Geoff Wong, Ray Pawson, Lesley Owen |
Abstract |
Legislation is one of the most powerful weapons for improving population health and is often used by policy and decision makers. Little research exists to guide them as to whether legislation is feasible and/or will succeed. We aimed to produce a coherent and transferable evidence based framework of threats to legislative interventions to assist the decision making process and to test this through the 'case study' of legislation to ban smoking in cars carrying children. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 11 | 48% |
Australia | 2 | 9% |
Iraq | 1 | 4% |
Italy | 1 | 4% |
Canada | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 48% |
Scientists | 8 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 160 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 3% |
United States | 2 | 1% |
Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 148 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 41 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 20% |
Student > Master | 21 | 13% |
Other | 12 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
Other | 31 | 19% |
Unknown | 17 | 11% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 49 | 31% |
Social Sciences | 39 | 24% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
Psychology | 6 | 4% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 3% |
Other | 20 | 13% |
Unknown | 25 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#2,249,308
of 24,973,800 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#2,567
of 16,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,457
of 113,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#17
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,973,800 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.