You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Canadian survey on pandemic flu preparations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, March 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-10-125 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Ritvo, Kumanan Wilson, JL Gibson, C Guglietti, CS Tracy, JX Nie, AR Jadad, REG Upshur, the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics Pandemic Ethics Working Group |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 18 | 24% |
| Unknown | 18 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Psychology | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,005,365
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,470
of 15,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,621
of 94,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#13
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,147 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.