↓ Skip to main content

Developing a national health research system: participatory approaches to legislative, institutional and networking dimensions in Zambia

Overview of attention for article published in Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing a national health research system: participatory approaches to legislative, institutional and networking dimensions in Zambia
Published in
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1478-4505-10-17
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pascalina Chanda-Kapata, Sandy Campbell, Christina Zarowsky

Abstract

For many sub-Saharan African countries, a National Health Research System (NHRS) exists more in theory than in reality, with the health system itself receiving the majority of investments. However, this lack of attention to NHRS development can, in fact, frustrate health systems in achieving their desired goals. In this case study, we discuss the ongoing development of Zambia's NHRS. We reflect on our experience in the ongoing consultative development of Zambia's NHRS and offer this reflection and process documentation to those engaged in similar initiatives in other settings. We argue that three streams of concurrent activity are critical in developing an NHRS in a resource-constrained setting: developing a legislative framework to determine and define the system's boundaries and the roles all actors will play within it; creating or strengthening an institution capable of providing coordination, management and guidance to the system; and focusing on networking among institutions and individuals to harmonize, unify and strengthen the overall capacities of the research community.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 3%
Indonesia 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Sierra Leone 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 68 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Master 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 14 19%
Unknown 18 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 31%
Social Sciences 15 20%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 18 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2020.
All research outputs
#6,109,554
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#717
of 1,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,095
of 166,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.