You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expressive language sampling as a source of outcome measures for treatment studies in fragile X syndrome: feasibility, practice effects, test-retest reliability, and construct validity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s11689-020-09313-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Leonard Abbeduto, Elizabeth Berry-Kravis, Audra Sterling, Stephanie Sherman, Jamie O. Edgin, Andrea McDuffie, Anne Hoffmann, Debra Hamilton, Michael Nelson, Jeannie Aschkenasy, Angela John Thurman |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 32 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 16 | 21% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 35 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2020.
All research outputs
#390,049
of 23,199,478 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#9
of 482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,437
of 367,907 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,199,478 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,907 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them