You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Growth and tolerance of infants fed formula supplemented with polydextrose (PDX) and/or galactooligosaccharides (GOS): double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-38 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Claude Ashley, William H Johnston, Cheryl L Harris, Suzanne I Stolz, Jennifer L Wampler, Carol Lynn Berseth |
Abstract |
To ensure the suitability of an infant formula as the sole source of nutrition or provide benefits similar to outcomes in breastfed infants, advancements in formula composition are warranted as more research detailing the nutrient composition of human milk becomes available. This study was designed to evaluate growth and tolerance in healthy infants who received one of two investigational cow's milk-based formulas with adjustments in carbohydrate, fat, and calcium content and supplemented with a prebiotic blend of polydextrose (PDX) and galactooligosaccharides (GOS) or GOS alone. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Argentina | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 126 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 33 | 25% |
Student > Master | 18 | 14% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
Other | 16 | 12% |
Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 18% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
Other | 17 | 13% |
Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2013.
All research outputs
#7,454,537
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#923
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,497
of 181,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#14
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 181,290 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.