↓ Skip to main content

Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in tumor surgery (PARITY) survey

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prophylactic antibiotic regimens in tumor surgery (PARITY) survey
Published in
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2474-13-91
Pubmed ID
Authors

Khaled Hasan, Antonella Racano, Benjamin Deheshi, Forough Farrokhyar, Jay Wunder, Peter Ferguson, Ginger Holt, Herbert Schwartz, Brad Petrisor, Mohit Bhandari, Michelle Ghert

Abstract

Deep infection following endoprosthetic limb reconstruction for sarcoma of the long bones is a devastating complication occurring in 15% of sarcoma patients. Optimizing infection protocols and conducting definitive surgical trials are critical to improving outcomes. In this study, the PARITY (Prophylactic Antibiotic Regimens in Tumor Surgery) investigators aimed to examine surgeon preferences in antibiotic prophylaxis and perceptions about current evidence, as well as to ascertain interest in resolving uncertainty in the evidence with clinical trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 54 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Master 9 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 10 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 58%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 10 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,044,262
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#621
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,089
of 166,837 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,837 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.