↓ Skip to main content

The 2011 Ming K Jeang Award for Excellence in Cell

Overview of attention for article published in Cell & Bioscience, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#44 of 914)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
googleplus
1 Google+ user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 2011 Ming K Jeang Award for Excellence in Cell & Bioscience
Published in
Cell & Bioscience, May 2012
DOI 10.1186/2045-3701-2-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yun-Bo Shi, Yun-Bo Shi

Abstract

Two research groups led by Dr T.C. Wu of Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions and Dr P. Liu of National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, respectively, have won the 2011 Ming K Jeang Award for Excellence in Cell & Bioscience.

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2014.
All research outputs
#2,603,825
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Cell & Bioscience
#44
of 914 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,426
of 163,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell & Bioscience
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 914 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them