You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Cost-effectiveness analysis of universal newborn screening for medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency in France
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, June 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-12-60 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Françoise F Hamers, Catherine Rumeau-Pichon |
Abstract |
Five diseases are currently screened on dried blood spots in France through the national newborn screening programme. Tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) is a technology that is increasingly used to screen newborns for an increasing number of hereditary metabolic diseases. Medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency (MCADD) is among these diseases. We sought to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of introducing MCADD screening in France. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Spain | 1 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 10 | 16% |
Researcher | 9 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
Other | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 8% |
Other | 8 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 37% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 5% |
Psychology | 3 | 5% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Other | 12 | 19% |
Unknown | 15 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,460,447
of 22,953,506 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#861
of 3,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,057
of 167,393 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#16
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,953,506 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,393 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.