You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
ARDS Subphenotypes: Understanding a Heterogeneous Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-020-2778-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer G. Wilson, Carolyn S. Calfee |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 27% |
| Mexico | 3 | 10% |
| Colombia | 3 | 10% |
| Panama | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Singapore | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 10 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
| Scientists | 5 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 204 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 204 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 32 | 16% |
| Researcher | 26 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 41 | 20% |
| Unknown | 52 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 98 | 48% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 51 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,486,202
of 24,081,774 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,334
of 6,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,886
of 371,313 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#46
of 136 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,081,774 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,313 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 136 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.