You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes using electronic health record information in Mexico
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-12-50 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas, Svetlana V Doubova, Magdalena Suarez-Ortega, Michael Law, Aakanksha H Pande, Jorge Escobedo, Francisco Espinosa-Larrañaga, Dennis Ross-Degnan, Anita K Wagner |
| Abstract |
Several low and middle-income countries are implementing electronic health records (EHR). In the near future, EHRs could become an efficient tool to evaluate healthcare performance if appropriate indicators are developed. The aims of this study are: a) to develop quality of care indicators (QCIs) for type 2 diabetes (T2DM) in the Mexican Institute of Social Security (IMSS) health system; b) to determine the feasibility of constructing QCIs using the IMSS EHR data; and c) to evaluate the quality of care (QC) provided to IMSS patients with T2DM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 2 | 40% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Hungary | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 2 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ghana | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 128 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 29 | 21% |
| Researcher | 21 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 26 | 19% |
| Unknown | 18 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 32% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Psychology | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 26 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2015.
All research outputs
#12,870,383
of 22,696,971 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#876
of 1,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,492
of 166,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#22
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,696,971 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,980 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.