↓ Skip to main content

Change in composition of the Anopheles gambiae complex and its possible implications for the transmission of malaria and lymphatic filariasis in north-eastern Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
113 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Change in composition of the Anopheles gambiae complex and its possible implications for the transmission of malaria and lymphatic filariasis in north-eastern Tanzania
Published in
Malaria Journal, June 2012
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-11-188
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yahya A Derua, Michael Alifrangis, Kenneth M Hosea, Dan W Meyrowitsch, Stephen M Magesa, Erling M Pedersen, Paul E Simonsen

Abstract

A dramatic decline in the incidence of malaria due to Plasmodium falciparum infection in coastal East Africa has recently been reported to be paralleled (or even preceded) by an equally dramatic decline in malaria vector density, despite absence of organized vector control. As part of investigations into possible causes for the change in vector population density, the present study analysed the Anopheles gambiae s.l. sibling species composition in north-eastern Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 3 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Senegal 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Ethiopia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 189 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 19%
Researcher 35 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 5%
Lecturer 10 5%
Other 30 15%
Unknown 46 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 28 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 8%
Environmental Science 12 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2023.
All research outputs
#7,587,538
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,255
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,654
of 170,129 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#25
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,129 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.