You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness and durability of Interceptor® long-lasting insecticidal nets in a malaria endemic area of central India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-11-189 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rajendra M Bhatt, Shri N Sharma, Sreehari Uragayala, Aditya P Dash, Raghavendra Kamaraju |
| Abstract |
In the present study, Interceptor®, long-lasting polyester net, 75 denier and bursting strength of minimum 250 kPa coated with alpha-cypermethrin @ 200 mg/m² was evaluated for its efficacy in reducing the mosquito density, blood feeding inhibition and malaria incidence in a tribal dominated malaria endemic area in Chhattisgarh state, central India. Its durability, washing practices and usage pattern by the community was also assessed up to a period of three years. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| Sudan | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 141 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 35 | 24% |
| Researcher | 25 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 29 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 21% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2016.
All research outputs
#7,414,160
of 22,668,244 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,438
of 5,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,109
of 166,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#24
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,668,244 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.