↓ Skip to main content

Gametic phase estimation over large genomic regions using an adaptive window approach

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genomics, November 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gametic phase estimation over large genomic regions using an adaptive window approach
Published in
Human Genomics, November 2003
DOI 10.1186/1479-7364-1-1-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laurent Excoffier, Guillaume Laval, David Balding

Abstract

The authors present ELB, an easy to programme and computationally fast algorithm for inferring gametic phase in population samples of multilocus genotypes. Phase updates are made on the basis of a window of neighbouring loci, and the window size varies according to the local level of linkage disequilibrium. Thus, ELB is particularly well suited to problems involving many loci and/or relatively large genomic regions, including those with variable recombination rate. The authors have simulated population samples of single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes with varying levels of recombination and marker density, and find that ELB provides better local estimation of gametic phase than the PHASE or HTYPER programs, while its global accuracy is broadly similar. The relative improvement in local accuracy increases both with increasing recombination and with increasing marker density. Short tandem repeat (STR, or microsatellite) simulation studies demonstrate ELB's superiority over PHASE both globally and locally. Missing data are handled by ELB; simulations show that phase recovery is virtually unaffected by up to 2 per cent of missing data, but that phase estimation is noticeably impaired beyond this amount. The authors also applied ELB to datasets obtained from random pairings of 42 human X chromosomes typed at 97 diallelic markers in a 200 kb low-recombination region. Once again, they found ELB to have consistently better local accuracy than PHASE or HTYPER, while its global accuracy was close to the best.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 7%
United States 2 4%
Switzerland 2 4%
Australia 1 2%
Unknown 46 84%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 24%
Professor 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 2 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 65%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Computer Science 3 5%
Mathematics 2 4%
Other 3 5%
Unknown 2 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Human Genomics
#211
of 564 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,195
of 57,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genomics
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 564 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 57,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them